In another legal setback for US president Donald Trump , a federal judge on Tuesday halted large portions of his executive order that blocks the federal government from working with any business linked to the law firm Susman Godfrey .
The Texas-based firm had represented a voting machine company in a high-profile defamation case that resulted in a $787 million settlement from Fox News over alleged false claims about the 2020 election.
US district judge Loren AliKhan granted a temporary restraining order in favour of Susman Godfrey, calling Trump’s order “a shocking abuse of power.” She said the move likely violates both the first and fifth amendments of the US constitution. “The government cannot hold lawyers hostage to force them to agree with it,” she added.
This is the fourth court ruling finding Trump's legal targeting of firms to be unconstitutional. Some firms agreed to settlements offering free legal services for Trump-backed causes, but Susman and at least three others chose to fight in court—and have so far won.
Susman’s lawyer, former US solicitor general Don Verrilli, argued that urgent judicial action was needed. “We’re sliding very fast into an abyss here,” he told the court.
The blocked parts of Trump’s order had banned federal contracts with firms like Susman and even restricted their staff from entering federal buildings. Verrilli also highlighted the suspicious timing of the order, issued just before Trump’s next defamation trial involving Newsmax.
The Texas-based firm had represented a voting machine company in a high-profile defamation case that resulted in a $787 million settlement from Fox News over alleged false claims about the 2020 election.
US district judge Loren AliKhan granted a temporary restraining order in favour of Susman Godfrey, calling Trump’s order “a shocking abuse of power.” She said the move likely violates both the first and fifth amendments of the US constitution. “The government cannot hold lawyers hostage to force them to agree with it,” she added.
This is the fourth court ruling finding Trump's legal targeting of firms to be unconstitutional. Some firms agreed to settlements offering free legal services for Trump-backed causes, but Susman and at least three others chose to fight in court—and have so far won.
Susman’s lawyer, former US solicitor general Don Verrilli, argued that urgent judicial action was needed. “We’re sliding very fast into an abyss here,” he told the court.
The blocked parts of Trump’s order had banned federal contracts with firms like Susman and even restricted their staff from entering federal buildings. Verrilli also highlighted the suspicious timing of the order, issued just before Trump’s next defamation trial involving Newsmax.
You may also like
Jesus death and resurrection films to watch this Easter weekend and where to stream
Perishers - 18th April 2025
'I used to go home black and blue from violence at school - it very nearly destroyed me'
Check your body every 3 weeks for these symptoms that could be cancer - see full list
JOHN HEALEY: 'We'll stop the rot in armed forces housing with new charter'
